Wikipedia:Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia's peer review process is a way to receive feedback from other editors about an article. An article may be nominated by any editor, and will appear on the list of all peer reviews. Other editors can comment on the review. Peer review may be used to establish an article's suitability as a good article nomination or featured article candidate. Peer review is a useful place to centralise reviews from many editors (for example, from those associated with a WikiProject). New Wikipedians are welcome. Peer reviews are open to any feedback, and nominators may also request subject-specific feedback. Editors and nominators may both edit articles during the discussion. Compared to the real-world peer review process, where experts themselves take part in reviewing the work of another, the majority of the volunteers here, like most editors in Wikipedia, lack expertise in the subject at hand. This is a good thing—it can make technically-worded articles more accessible to the average reader. Those looking for expert input should consider contacting editors on the volunteers list, or contacting a relevant WikiProject. To request a review, see the instructions page. Nominators are limited to one review at a time, and are encouraged to help reduce the backlog by commenting on other reviews. Any editor may comment on a review, and there is no requirement that any comment be acted on. A list of all current peer reviews, with reviewers' comments included, can be found here. For easier navigation, a list of peer reviews, without the reviews themselves included, can be found here. A chronological peer reviews list can be found here.
ArtsMelodifestivalenThe article was promoted in 2007 and since then has significantly updated. After giving a quick read, I have noticed some of the materials unsourced and therefore I believe it would be communities best interest to have a peer review and decide if the article is worth delisting. Thanks, IW. (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Toni Collette
Raff & GammonI've listed this article for peer review because I wonder what other people will think about it. I am worried that there is something wrong with the article and I need someone to help me out. I also doing this to learn more about creating articles and how I can create a better one. Sincerely, Analog Horror, (Speak) 03:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Vaneeza AhmadI've added this article for peer review due to uncertainty over whether the discography section recently added is appropriate and correctly used, with it listing primarily television programmes and seemingly no work by the subject of the article; for the sake of the article plus my own future reference, I am wondering whether a different type of section would be more accurate and appropriate in this case, and welcome more experienced opinion. Further, I have found no sources describing the subject as a singer, and therefore a recent edit categorising them as "Singer" is suspect; while they may have sung here and there, Ahmad's established career is reportedly that of a model and actress. Thanks, Moggie2002 (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Eric EastonThis is an obscure chap, co-manager of the Rolling Stones with Andrew Loog Oldham but until now without an article. I mean, he was obscure, but not that obscure. Anyway, since this is slightly off my usual FAC tour, I'd like to throw it open to more eyes, particularly regarding chronology, background/context, MOS issues (particularly wrt music) and any good sourcing I've missed. Let's, as they say, spend some time together. Cheers! ——SN54129 19:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC) A few things:
Overall, this article is well-sourced (excluding earlier mentions). I would say to make sure the article doesn't go into too much detail (The article's prose size is approaching 40kB, not too long but definitely long). Username6892 05:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
The Boys in the BarThe article was promoted as Good Article in 2012. I plan to nominate it as Featured Article Candidate in the future. I welcome suggestions before doing so. BTW, I was torn between starting the PR discussion and re-requesting copyediting as I did previously in 2013. George Ho (talk) 07:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Sakura Wars (2019 video game)I've listed this article for peer review because after over 2 years, WT:VG has gotten all the mainline Sakura Wars games up to GA, with the exception of the 2019 Sakura Wars, which will be released worldwide this April. To nominate the games as a good topic and eventually, a featured topic, we should get this article peer reviewed to make sure there are no problems. ProtoDrake and I have been working on the articles quite a bit these past few months. We're looking for any improvements that can be made before the game's international release and the changes associated with it. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Xanthi CarnivalI've listed this article for peer review because…it is about an annual event that is happening right now and it would be extremely helpful for visitors and for the benefit of the local community,but it is still unreviewd by the editors and I'm trying to get some help,maybe there is something wrong ... Thanks, Gnslps (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Warpaint (band)I've listed this article for peer review, because I replaced class=Start by class=C for an article better than class=C. Thanks, 84.46.53.249 (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Game of ThronesI've listed this article for peer review because I believe the article can be promoted to FA. I think having a peer review to see what needs to be worked on before a FA nomination will be extremely beneficial. Thank you, -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Fleet Street (album)I've listed this article for peer review because I hope it might be worthy of WP:GA status at some point! I've been the only editor on it so far, though, so I would love a second third pair of eyes on it to help me see how to make it better. — Shrinkydinks (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
SpongeBob SquarePants (character)
Fiona Graham
The Offies (The Off West End Theatre Awards)I've listed this article for peer review because I would like recommendations and suggestions on making it the best it can be. Thanks, TheGravel (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Comments from PotentPotablesI've made a few edits to the article to tidy it up a bit:
Suggestions:
Hope these comments give some help for further development! PotentPotables (talk) 00:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Mullum Malarum
Art Ducko (student magazine)I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it's ready to be made into an official wikipedia page. Thanks, Eric Schucht (talk) 03:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
KJP1 - Thanks for looking at my page. What happened was I was trying to get my sandbox page reviewed and made into an official page, and I got mixed up and thought the peer review page was the place to do it. When I found the right place it was reviewed and not approved due to not having enough sources. So it got removed, leaving nothing but the redirect. Hope this helps clear things up. Eric Schucht (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Sorry Aoba47, the article has since been deleted. Eric Schucht (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Everyday lifeLebanon national football teamI'm looking to nominate the article for FAC. I feel that I have taken care of the issues pointed out in the previous peer review. Just want to make sure everything is good to go before nominating for FA. Nehme1499 (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Ng On-yeeI've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get feedback to assist in bringing it up to GA standard. Thanks, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Benny, The lede is the big issue with this one. It's quite a well sourced article. I should note, I saw two videos in the references, so you might want to check that they are reliable sources. There are some issues with paragraphing (better to have multiple sentences in a paragraph.) I noticed theres a link to 2013 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games – Six-red snooker, which would be better as saying "she won a medal at the 2013 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games in the six-red snooker event. I'd also suggest a Copyedit. Otherwise, probably good to go. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Engineering and technologyLego Star Wars: The Complete SagaI've listed this article for peer review because… The gameplay is more descriptive, the plots for all 6 films have been edited to fit the lack of dialogue in the game, and the development section has a bit more content (I have a feeling I should add more to that section of the article). Also, because Lego Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga is coming out in 2020, I want to see if this could somehow become a featured article on whatever day Lego Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga will be released in stores. Thanks, OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Nokia 3I've listed this article for peer review because:
Thanks, RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 07:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Ontario Highway 418I've listed this article for a 2nd peer review because 400-series highways, a good topic, risks losing good topic status because this article is only C-class. I have asked the Canada Roads WikiProject but I haven't had a response from them yet and the good topic grace period is supposed to end on March 9th (in 2 days) because the highway opened on December 9th. I have made some improvements to it but I'm not sure if the article is B-class or GA quality yet. Thanks, Username6892 02:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Brooklyn BridgeI've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate this page for Featured Article status someday. This page is about the oldest fixed bridge across New York City's East River, and as one of the most famous bridges in the world, is listed as a level-4 vital topic. While I think this article is generally comprehensive, thanks to a comprehensive GA review by Kingsif and a copy edit by Twofingered Typist, I would like feedback to determine if there are any major outstanding issues, specifically regarding references and coverage. Thanks, epicgenius (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Collapse of the World Trade CenterI've listed this article for peer review because we are interested in advancing the article through the Featured Article Candidate process and need external feedback to determine what we need to do to make the article better. We have been at an impasse for some time as to how technical we need to make the article as well as to whether we are staying well focused on the matter and not diverging away from what should be the main effort. Otherwise the article is relatively stable, well referenced and comprehensive. Thank you! --MONGO (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC) Comments from EpicgeniusAs a long-time follower of this page, I would like to see this at FAC someday. However, I think this needs some improvements first, and that maybe this should first go through GAN. For instance:
These are my initial comments, and I hope to leave more later. If I find any minor issues, I'll fix them myself, but these are things to keep in mind. epicgenius (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
RyzenI've listed this article for peer review because… I wish to seek how to move all of the tables being used on this page to a page that already exist for these tables. The talk page has low or no activity at most times. Regice2020 (talk) 01:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Atlantic City–Brigantine ConnectorI've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for an FA review. It is currently a GA-status article and has undergone many improvements since its promotion 10 years ago. Thanks, –Dream out loud (talk) 11:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Prandtl-DI've listed this article for peer review because I think it has the capacity to become a great article and would like other user's feedback on it. I hope to improve the list of vehicle section and overall syntax of the article. Thanks, - AH (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC) Comments by paul2520Hi, AttackHelicopter51. I have a few comments:
I think the cites are good otherwise. All from NASA, but that's OK.
GeneralMercer County Community CollegeI've listed this article for peer review because I have updated it with appropriate images, stronger citations, and more thorough content than it had previously and would like to have it reevaluated for higher rating than simply start. Thanks, Hollykatharine (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Hollykatharine! Thanks for your impressive efforts on the article. The pictures definitely enhance the content. A couple areas for improvement (and not necessarily to your edits):
Otherwise, I think the page looks great! = paul2520 (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Paul2520! Thanks for the good advice. I removed the excess hyperlinks as you suggested. I think you're right that the "Mission" section looks better as you've formatted it. I also updated the caption for the Trey Anastasio photo. I think the MCTV 26 and WWFM aren't clubs so they are okay as is. I appreciate your help. Hollykatharine (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
A couple of things I found:
Other than that, this article is in good shape. Username6892 04:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Institute of International and European AffairsI've listed this article for peer review because I wish to know how to improve it further. I have recently updated the page to replace non-neutral content. I have replaced original research and added content and citations to the article, particularly in the history section. I have continued to include the criticisms raised in previous versions of the page (that are not original research) but have included additional information to give these more context. The page has not been reverted in the weeks since I have completed these changes. However, this may simply because it is not read very often. I would be interested to know what other Wikipedia editors think of the page now and what else should be done improve it. I am still new to the Wikipedia process. This is the first article that I have made many modifications to. Thanks, Ballystrahan (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Max BlumenthalI've listed this article for peer review because the subject has reported concerns about their article. Since WP:BLP is one of the three core content policies of the project, I would appreciate impartial editors reviewing and improving this article. Thanks, --ZiaLater (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Metro (restaurant chain)I've listed this article for peer review because I recently expanded the content from stub level to more details regarding the company and it's background with proper references and citation, and would like to request for grammar and style of writing check to improve the article quality. Thanks, WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
LandfillI've listed this article for peer review because I want to promote it to good article status. It has already failed GAN once. But I have addressed the issues and would like to disscuss how we can improve the article before renominating it for GA Review. Thanks, DishitaBhowmik 05:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Goel RatzonThis is my first full article in English Wikipedia, and I'd be happy for reviewing it. Thanks, MagicWord (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Kee Mar CollegeI've listed this article for peer review because I'd appreciate suggestions for how to improve the article in light of the available sources. Should the structure be changed? Is there any chance of this passing a GAN given the lack of available sources? Thanks, TJMSmith (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
I think a couple of things should definitely be addressed:
--Username6892 04:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Biblioteca MarcianaI've listed this article for peer review because additional information has been added since it received Good Article status in order to prepare it for a Featured Article request. The Biblioteca Marciana is one of Venice's foremost monuments with a long history, an imposing building, and lavish art. I would like the article to present and cover all of the relevant information in a clear and meaningful manner, both for casual and advanced readers, and would appreciate any guidance and/or suggestions to further improve the article and make it a thorough source for information about the library. Thanks, Venicescapes (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Standby...Lights! Camera! Action!I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know what I could do to improve this article to B-class or higher. Thanks, Chrisnait (talk | contribs) 18:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
— RealFakeKimT 08:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Geography and placesNew York CityI've listed this article for peer review because New York City is an important city and because the article could use some fresh eyes to look it over. Thanks, Attic Salt (talk) 20:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
North Potomac, MarylandI've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to Good Article. I have not been able to find any examples of a GA for a Census Designated Place, so I am in unfamiliar territory. I am aware of some of the changes being made at Census and the US Geological Survey (major sources), and understand that some changes are scheduled to be finalized March 31. Any suggestions on how to handle those are always welcome. I have found it difficult to get enough reliable sources. For example: anyone who has been in North Potomac will notice that gray squirrels are everywhere, yet I felt like nothing could be said about that because there are no books, government web sites, or newspaper articles that mention this. The other two major items for North Potomac are the Asian population and the good schools—I was able to find a newspaper article or two for those topics. Thanks, TwoScars (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Air pollution in TurkeyI've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know what needs to be done before nominating it as a good article Thanks, Chidgk1 (talk) 13:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Morpeth, NorthumberlandI would like nominate this article for FA, but would appreciate feedback through a peer review on whether it is ready for a featured article nomination. I welcome any and all comments, suggestions etc. Thanks and happy editing, Dreamy Jazz |
